Gardasil Dangers ?

Image via Wikipedia

Gardasil and Cervarix are similar drugs promoted as a cervical cancer vaccine.

 
The drugs vary in the types of human papillomavirus (HPV) they treat, which is the virus said to cause cervical cancer. Gardasil, manufactured by Merck, Inc.,  is promoted as the only cervical cancer vaccine that helps protect against four kinds of HPV (types 6, 11, 16 and 18), including two types that cause 70 percent of cervical cancer cases, and two more types that cuase 90 percent of genital warts cases.
Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline,  is not currently available in the United States, but was approved for use in the U.S. by the FDA on October 16, 2009, and is expected to enter the market here by late 2009. It is already approved for use in Australia, the Phillipines and the European Union. It is used in the UK for a national program of vaccination for teen and pre-teen girls to target two types of HPV (types 16 and 18) for the prevention of cervical cancer and pre-cancers.

Both Gardasil and Ceravix are marketed to be given to girls and young women as young as age 9, and up to age 26.

Since Gardasil’s introduction in 2006, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has received more than 15,000 reports of adverse side effects related to Gardasil. These reports include serious adverse 
side effects including Guilliane Barre, lupus, seizures, paralysis, blood clots, brain inflammation and many others. There also have been 44 reported deaths as a result of Gardasil uses.

Cervarix has been linked to more than 2,000 cases of serious, adverse reactions since the UK government began administering it to schoolgirls last year. One of the worst cases involved 14-year-old Natalie Morton, who collapsed and died in school in England just one hour after receiving the vaccine.

Then, on October 25, 2009, Dr. Diane Harper, lead researcher in the development of two human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines and director of the Gynecologic Cancer Prevention Research Group at the University of Missouri, told an audience of medical professionals that Gardasil is largely unnecessary, and that it has never been fully tested on females under the age of 15. This, despite strong marketing efforts to make the drug mandatory for girls, and product literature and advertising that state the product can be used by girls as young as age 9.

On Oct. 16, 2009, the same day GlaxoSmithKline got approval to market its Cervarix drug in the U.S. the FDA also granted approval to Merck to expand the use of Gardasil in the U.S. to treat boys and men ages 9-26 for the prevention of genital warts.

Ad in the United States, and is recommended for girls and women ages 9-26 by manufacturer Merck, Inc.

In February 2009, the National Vaccine Information Center, a private vaccine-safety group, conducted a comparative study of adverse events reported following a Menactra (meningococcal) vaccine versus the Gardasil vaccine.  Both vaccines are recommended for youngsters in the same age group, at 11-12 years old (Menactra for boys and girls, Gardasil for girls only). The study compares VAERS data reported for each vaccine.

The study found that Gardasil is associated with at least twice as many Emergency Room visit reports, four times more death reports, five times more “did not recover” reports, and seven times more “disabled” reports, as compared to Menactra.
Other findings of this study show that compared to Menactra:

• Gardasil is associated with all reports of blood clots
• Gardasil is associated with at lest four times as many cardiac arrest reports
• Gardasil is associated with at least six times as many fainting reports
• Gardasil is associated with at least four times as many Lupus reports
• Gardasil is associated with at least 15 times as many stroke reports

Saudi Government Bans Avandia (Georgia/Florida)

Saudi Arabia has suspended GlaxoSmithKline PLC's (GSK) diabetes drug Avandia for six months, saying the product's heart risks outweigh its benefits, but the U.K.-based drug maker said its stands by the controversial drug.

The Saudi Food and Drug Authority said on its website that the risk of using Avandia, also known as rosiglitazone, "outweighs its benefit, especially risks of cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure in addition to increased risk of fractures."

It said safer alternatives could be used there instead.

Glaxo responded by saying "the Saudi regulatory authority action is based on a review that did not include the most recent scientific data on Avandia."

"GlaxoSmithKline stands behind the safety and efficacy of Avandia when used appropriately and according to its label and maintains that this is an important medicine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes."

Glaxo now has six months to provide the Saudi drug regulator with evidence of why rosiglitazone and combination products containing it should not be taken off the Saudi market permanently. Rosiglitazone containing products marketed in Saudi Arabia are Avandia , Avandamet and Avandaryl.

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100322-710067.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines